最新消息:

云原生安全-从k8s日志审计视角检测自动化工具攻击

好的外部文章和内容 admin 335浏览 0评论

1. 前言

 1.1 背景

随着云原生技术的普及,其暴露出来的攻击面也被黑客们念念不忘,相关的攻击技术也跟着被“普及”,自动化漏洞利用攻击工具更是如雨后春笋般出现在GitHub开源平台,其中比较有代表性的如cdk-team/CDK。其是一款为容器环境定制的渗透测试工具,在已攻陷的容器内部提供零依赖的常用命令及PoC/EXP。集成Docker/K8s场景特有的 逃逸、横向移动、持久化利用方式,插件化管理。

在漏洞利用门槛如此低廉的今天,作为企业安全的建设者(搬砖人),除了考虑部署容器层面运行时检测平台,在k8s api-server层面,启用日志审计功能,也是一个成本低廉又高效发现入侵攻击的途径。

通过对api-server的日志进行审计分析,对于攻击者的信息收集行为,部署k8s cronjob后门、利用rbac做权限提升等持久化攻击行为都能及时的发现并输出告警。

1.2 kubernetes日志审计介绍

Kubernetes 审计功能提供了与安全相关的按时间顺序排列的记录集,记录单个用户、管理员或系统其他组件影响系统的活动顺序。 它能帮助集群管理员处理以下问题:

- 发生了什么?
- 什么时候发生的?
- 谁触发的?
- 为什么发生?
- 在哪观察到的?
- 它从哪触发的?
- 它将产生什么后果?

审计日志示例(图片来自参考[5]

如何开启日志审计

1、api-server命令行启动时,添加如下参数

--audit-policy-file=/etc/kubernetes/audit/audit-default-policy.yaml        # 审计策略文件
--audit-log-path=/data/log/audit/audit.log                                 # kube-apiserver 输出的审计日志文件,此处以日志文件落地的方式做日志收集
--audit-log-maxbackup=10                                                   # kube-apiserver 审计日志文件的最大备份数量
--audit-log-format=json                                                    #日志保存格式
--audit-log-maxage=10                                                      #日志最大保留时间
--audit-log-maxsize=500

2、kubeadm启动时

修改api-server配置文件/etc/kubernetes/manifests/kube-apiserver.yaml,增加如下内容

--audit-policy-file=/etc/kubernetes/audit/audit-default-policy.yaml
--audit-log-path=/data/log/audit/audit.log 
--audit-log-maxbackup=10 
--audit-log-format=json
--audit-log-maxage=10
--audit-log-maxsize=500

 

2. 攻击行为检测

2.1 分析流程

若攻击者通过各种手段拿到一个容器shell环境后,下一步必然是利用这个容器进行信息收集,获取更多敏感信息或机器资源,此时,CDK作为一款自动化的攻击工具,就让整个攻击过程如虎添翼,大大提高攻击效率。

作为甲方安全的守护者,从安全建设的角度,如何有效及时的发现攻击者的入侵行为,是一个无法避开的问题。本文通过观察cdk的攻击行为,从k8s日志审计的角度罗列一些入侵检测的常见规则。

目前,针对于日志的审计分析,我们落地方案的整个流程为:

注:下列场景,仅限于原生的CDK行为检测,如果攻击者具备开发能力,修改对应特征,可以绕过对应的检测规则。

2.2 信息收集

CDK在容器内主要收集以下信息:

工具在镜像内运行,其信息收集的结果执如下:

从图上可知,信息收集的整个过程,存在与api-server交互的仅有网络探测部分,总共会向api-server发送三条请求,分别为API-server、namespace、api信息探测。

2.2.1 探测API-server

audit.log

{
    "kind": "Event",
    "apiVersion": "audit.k8s.io/v1",
    "level": "Metadata",
    "stage": "ResponseComplete",
    "requestURI": "/",
    "verb": "get",
    "user": {
        "username": "system:anonymous",
        "groups": [
            "system:unauthenticated"
        ]
    },
    "sourceIPs": [
        "172.18.0.2"
    ],
    "userAgent": "Go-http-client/1.1",
    "responseStatus": {
        "metadata": {},
        "status": "Failure",
        "reason": "Forbidden",
        "code": 403
    },
    "requestReceivedTimestamp": "2023-02-02T08:29:12.189459Z",
    "stageTimestamp": "2023-02-02T08:29:12.189553Z",
    "annotations": {
        "authorization.k8s.io/decision": "forbid",
        "authorization.k8s.io/reason": ""
    }
}

2.2.2 列举namespace

audit.log

{
    "kind": "Event",
    "apiVersion": "audit.k8s.io/v1",
    "level": "Metadata",
    "auditID": "41770e7a-1827-4a14-860f-a812d3db1647",
    "stage": "ResponseComplete",
    "requestURI": "/api/v1/namespaces",
    "verb": "list",
    "user": {
        "username": "system:serviceaccount:test:default",
        "uid": "63b8dd88-88dd-4426-bdd1-7966906dc0d5",
        "groups": [
            "system:serviceaccounts",
            "system:serviceaccounts:test",
            "system:authenticated"
        ]
    },
    "sourceIPs": [
        "172.18.0.2"
    ],
    "userAgent": "Go-http-client/1.1",
    "objectRef": {
        "resource": "namespaces",
        "apiVersion": "v1"
    },
    "responseStatus": {
        "metadata": {},
        "status": "Failure",
        "reason": "Forbidden",
        "code": 403
    },
    "requestReceivedTimestamp": "2023-02-02T08:29:12.205422Z",
    "stageTimestamp": "2023-02-02T08:29:12.205485Z",
    "annotations": {
        "authorization.k8s.io/decision": "forbid",
        "authorization.k8s.io/reason": ""
    }
}

2.2.3 探测可访问的api

跟namespace类似,只不过requestURI为/apis

2.2.4 总结

综上, 上述日志中可概述为,当cdk在做信息收集时,会向api-server请求3次,分别访问/,/apis,/api/v1/namespaces,可根据这些特征做告警规则

1、userAgent: Go-http-client/1.1      # CDK特定的userAgent,此时,该字段为主要特征
2、responseStatus.code: 403           #默认serviceaccount无权限时 api-server返回的状态码
3、requestURI: /                      # 访问根目录

2.3 漏洞利用

Exploit模块包含的功能:

2.3.1 容器逃逸

其中,容器逃逸层面,一般是不需要与api-server做交互的,也就不会留下日志。但部分容器逃逸手段是利用错误配置的pod在创建时实施攻击。因此,容器逃逸的检测必须前置到容器创建时,记录下应用请求的权限,然后结合运行时入侵检测做进一步监控。

当一个拥有privilege、sys_admin、network、ipc等特殊权限的pod创建时,它的日志记录是这样的。

audit.json

{
    "kind": "Event",
    "apiVersion": "audit.k8s.io/v1",
    "level": "RequestResponse",
    "stage": "ResponseComplete",
    "requestURI": "/api/v1/namespaces/testpods/pods",
    "verb": "create",
    "user": {
        "username": "kubernetes-admin",
        "groups": [
            "system:masters",
            "system:authenticated"
        ]
    },
    "sourceIPs": [
        "172.18.0.1"
    ],
    "userAgent": "kubectl1.16.15/v1.16.15 (darwin/amd64) kubernetes/2adc8d7",
    "objectRef": {
        "resource": "pods",
        "namespace": "testpods",
        "name": "testpod",
        "apiVersion": "v1"
    },
    "responseStatus": {
        "metadata": {},
        "code": 201
    },
    "responseObject": {
        "kind": "Pod",
        "apiVersion": "v1",
        "metadata": {
            "name": "testpod",
            "namespace": "testpods",
            "selfLink": "/api/v1/namespaces/testpods/pods/testpod",
            "uid": "e717d204-7e6d-4608-998b-648a8667e8e1",
            "resourceVersion": "13517",
            "creationTimestamp": "2023-02-02T09:51:10Z",
            "labels": {
                "creator": "zhiye",
                "team": "teamf"
            }
        },
        "spec": {
            "volumes": [
                {
                    "name": "rootfs",
                    "hostPath": {
                        "path": "/",
                        "type": ""
                    }
                }
            ],
            "containers": [
                {
                    "name": "trpe",
                    "image": "alpine",
                    "command": [
                        "/bin/sh",
                        "-c",
                        "tail -f /dev/null"
                    ],
                    "resources": {},
                    "volumeMounts": [
                        {
                            "name": "default-token-mm6s8",
                            "readOnly": true,
                            "mountPath": "/var/run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount"
                        }
                    ],
                    "terminationMessagePath": "/dev/termination-log",
                    "terminationMessagePolicy": "File",
                    "imagePullPolicy": "Always",
                    "securityContext": {
                        "capabilities": {
                            "add": [
                                "SYS_ADMIN"
                            ]
                        },
                        "privileged": true
                    }
                }
            ],
            "restartPolicy": "Always",
            "terminationGracePeriodSeconds": 30,
            "dnsPolicy": "ClusterFirst",
            "serviceAccountName": "default",
            "serviceAccount": "default",
            "hostNetwork": true,
            "hostPID": true,
            "hostIPC": true,
            "securityContext": {},
            "schedulerName": "default-scheduler",
            "tolerations": [
                {
                    "key": "node.kubernetes.io/not-ready",
                    "operator": "Exists",
                    "effect": "NoExecute",
                    "tolerationSeconds": 300
                },
                {
                    "key": "node.kubernetes.io/unreachable",
                    "operator": "Exists",
                    "effect": "NoExecute",
                    "tolerationSeconds": 300
                }
            ],
            "priority": 0,
            "enableServiceLinks": true
        },
        "status": {
            "phase": "Pending",
            "qosClass": "BestEffort"
        }
    },
    "requestReceivedTimestamp": "2023-02-02T09:51:10.632436Z",
    "stageTimestamp": "2023-02-02T09:51:10.660958Z",
    "annotations": {
        "authorization.k8s.io/decision": "allow",
        "authorization.k8s.io/reason": ""
    }
}

从日志上可以看出,针对于错误配置导致的逃逸,我们可以关注以下几个日志字段,制定告警规则。

responseObject.spec.volumes                                         # 检测敏感卷,是否挂载docker.sock等
responseObject.spec.containers.volumeMounts                         # 检测敏感挂载,是否挂载docker.sock等
responseObject.spec.containers.securityContext.capabilities.add     # 是否使用SYS_ADMIN权限,(字段嵌套这么多层,真的得吐槽
responseObject.spec.containers.securityContext.privileged           # 检测是否为特权pod容器
responseObject.spec.hostNetwork                                     # 是否使用宿主机网络
responseObject.spec.hostPID                                         # 是否使用宿主机hostPID
responseObject.spec.hostIPC                                         # 是否共享宿主机内存
responseObject.spec.serviceAccount                                  # 是否使用特殊的serviceaccount  默认为default
2.3.2 网络探测

此功能为端口扫描+指纹识别,不涉及与API交互,未产生日志。

2.3.3 信息窃取

与api-server交互的为secrets、config和psp,如果是自动获取的话,cdk会发送两次请求,分别使用匿名账户和当前serviceaccout做list动作。

下边列举些主要特征

requestURI: /api/v1/secrets,
requestURI: /api/v1/configmaps
requestURI: /apis/policy/v1beta1/podsecuritypolicies
userAgent: Go-http-client/1.1
user.username: "system:anonymous"
responseStatus.code: 403
"verb": "list"

2.3.4 权限提升

RBAC权限绕过

日志如下

{
    "kind": "Event",
    "apiVersion": "audit.k8s.io/v1",
    "level": "RequestResponse",
    "auditID": "bfc643d6-8337-434e-9dec-ba41dd36bfa7",
    "stage": "ResponseComplete",
    "requestURI": "/api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/pods",
    "verb": "create",
    "user": {
        "username": "system:serviceaccount:test:default",
        "uid": "63b8dd88-88dd-4426-bdd1-7966906dc0d5",
        "groups": [
            "system:serviceaccounts",
            "system:serviceaccounts:test",
            "system:authenticated"
        ]
    },
    "sourceIPs": [
        "172.18.0.3"
    ],
    "userAgent": "Go-http-client/1.1",
    "objectRef": {
        "resource": "pods",
        "namespace": "kube-system",
        "apiVersion": "v1"
    },
    "responseStatus": {
        "metadata": {},
        "status": "Failure",
        "reason": "Forbidden",
        "code": 403
    },
    "responseObject": {
        "kind": "Status",
        "apiVersion": "v1",
        "metadata": {},
        "status": "Failure",
        "message": "pods is forbidden: User \"system:serviceaccount:test:default\" cannot create resource \"pods\" in API group \"\" in the namespace \"kube-system\"",
        "reason": "Forbidden",
        "details": {
            "kind": "pods"
        },
        "code": 403
    },
    "requestReceivedTimestamp": "2023-02-03T09:56:24.061825Z",
    "stageTimestamp": "2023-02-03T09:56:24.061888Z",
    "annotations": {
        "authorization.k8s.io/decision": "forbid",
        "authorization.k8s.io/reason": ""
    }
}

由上可发现如下特征:

Pod内serviceaccount无权限的情况
requestURI: /api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/pods
userAgent: Go-http-client/1.1
responseStatus.code: 403 

Pod内serviceaccount有权限的情况
requestURI: /api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/pods
responseObject.metadata.selfLink: /api/v1/namespaces/kube-system/pods/cdk-rbac-bypass-create-pod  
responseObject.metadata.spec.containers.args: *cat /run/secrets/kubernetes.io/serviceaccount/token* 
verb: create

2.3.5 持久化

部署daemonset后门

源码是这样定义的(参考[6]):

体现到日志中,有以下几个点:

objectRef.name: cdk-backdoor-daemonset
objectRef.namespace: kube-system
responseObject.metadata.selfLink: /apis/apps/v1/namespaces/kube-system/daemonsets/cdk-backdoor-daemonset
responseObject.spec.template.spec.volumes.hostPath.path: /
responseObject.spec.template.spec.containers.name: cdk-backdoor-pod
responseObject.spec.template.spec.containers.securityContext[capabilities:ptivileged]:如图上所示
responseObject.spec.template.spec.[hostNetwork|hostPID]: true

部署K8S CronJob

CDK源代码是这样定义的(参考[7]):

体现在日志中,特征有以下几点:

requestURI: /apis/batch/v1beta1/namespaces/kube-system/cronjobs
verb: create
objectRef.name: cdk-backdoor-cronjob
responseObject.matadata.name: cdk-backdoor-cronjob
responseObject.matadata.selfLink: /apis/batch/v1beta1/namespaces/kube-system/cronjobs/cdk-backdoor-cronjob
responseObject.spec.jobTemplate.spec.template.spec.containers.name: cdk-backdoor-cronjob-container

部署影子k8s api-server

在pod权限足够的情况下,通过创建shadow api-server做权限维持,详情见参考[4]

在非二开的情况下,通过k8s日志升级可检测以下几个字段

objectRef.name: *-shadow-*
responseObject.metadata.labels.component: kube-apiservershadow
responseObject.spec.containers.command: "--secure-port=9444"

2.3.6 总结

因为漏洞利用部分,动作都普遍较大,因此可观测字段已不仅仅局限于userAgent,其特征均比较明显,极富有工具本身特色

2.4 API利用

2.4.1 Tool模块

此处需要关注的(跟api-server有交互的)为kcurl命令,此命令可借助高权限serviceaccount账户列举/使用k8s资源。

执行./cdk kcurl default get ‘https://10.96.0.1:443/api/v1/nodes’ ,日志内容如下:

audit.log

{
    "kind": "Event",
    "apiVersion": "audit.k8s.io/v1",
    "level": "Metadata",
    "auditID": "418cafa5-2c1e-4fbf-b086-3d68e321d2bb",
    "stage": "ResponseComplete",
    "requestURI": "/api/v1/nodes",
    "verb": "list",
    "user": {
        "username": "system:serviceaccount:test:default",
        "uid": "63b8dd88-88dd-4426-bdd1-7966906dc0d5",
        "groups": [
            "system:serviceaccounts",
            "system:serviceaccounts:test",
            "system:authenticated"
        ]
    },
    "sourceIPs": [
        "172.18.0.3"
    ],
    "userAgent": "Go-http-client/1.1",
    "objectRef": {
        "resource": "nodes",
        "apiVersion": "v1"
    },
    "responseStatus": {
        "metadata": {},
        "code": 200
    },
    "requestReceivedTimestamp": "2023-02-06T09:51:51.790260Z",
    "stageTimestamp": "2023-02-06T09:51:51.791075Z",
    "annotations": {
        "authorization.k8s.io/decision": "allow",
        "authorization.k8s.io/reason": "RBAC: allowed by ClusterRoleBinding \"defaultadmin\" of ClusterRole \"cluster-admin\" to ServiceAccount \"default/test\""
    }
}

日志中annotations.authorization.k8s.io/reason给出了允许执行的原因。我们可以根据如下三个字段制定告警规则:

serviceaccount有权限的情况下:
annotations.authorization.k8s.io/reason
annotations.authorization.k8s.io/decision
userAgent: Go-http-client/1.1
responseStatus.code:200

无权限的情况下:
userAgent: Go-http-client/1.1
responseStatus.code:403

2.4.2 总结

因为tool模块需要借助高权限serviceaccount或token,因此,权限不足的情况下,api-server返回responseStatus.code: 403 的条目说明了api-server接受到了非预期请求,结合userAgent等信息便可输出可疑告警。

3. 不仅仅是CDK

3.1 CVE-2022-3172 K8S聚合 

API(Aggregation API)SSRF漏洞.

聚合 API 实际上是在 kube-apiserver 中运行的,在新 API 注册之前,它并不会工作。如果要添加新的 API,则需要创建一个APIService 对象,用来申请 Kubernetes 中新的 URL 路径。注册成功后,当有发送到此路径中的请求,则会被转发到已经注册的 APIService 上。

APIService 可以将客户端的请求转发到任意的 URL 上,这就有可能会导致 Client 发送请求时,所携带的一些认证信息可能会被发送给第三方。

通过日志审计监控responseStatus.code字段来进行判断是否有出现重定向的情况,通过检测如下字段:

responseObject.code:302
responseObject.code:301

3.2 使用不合规镜像创建pod

除了cdk这种常见的攻击手法,还有一些常见的异常行为需要我们关注,比如一般企业内,pod创建使用的容器均会从企业私有的镜像仓库中拉取,此时如果日志中出现了公共仓库的镜像,则可判断为异常,可关注以下字段

verb : create
level:RequestResponse
esponseObject.kind:Pod 
requestObject.spec.containers.image:镜像仓库地址

3.3 pod命令执行

对于kubectl exec命令进行监控,可对如下字段进行监控,注:命令执行的后续无法通过日志审计来进一步监控,需结合运行时检测进一步分析

objectRef.subresource:exec
objectRef.subresource:attach
userAgent

4. 落地实践踩过的坑

1、主要为k8s日志类型比较多,且每种类型的字段名,字段数量均不一致,导致es在存储数据时存在索引内字段类型不一致无法解析存储的问题。

解决方案为对于字段不一致的obj,选择为不做深层次解析。(或者使用hdfs等存储方式,查询时对字段进行解析

2、日志量过大,导致api-server磁盘读写io过高

持续优化audit.yaml中的日志规则,对于其中的node/status,pod/status,coordination.k8s.io/leases等不做日志记录。

5. 总结

本文从k8s日志审计的角度,分析当使用cdk等自动化攻击时,能够从日志中获取到的信息,并给出通过这些信息可监控字段的告警示例。因为这部分字段都比较固定,完全可以通过机器学习提升告警准确率。抛砖引玉,希望后续可以看到更多日志的分析防御角度。

当然,CDK作为开源工具,这些特征都可以做关键字替换。因此,笔者认为功夫应该用到平时,加强k8s的基线管控,比如避免出现高serviceaccount权限、通过准入策略限制使用的docker镜像,并部署容器运行时入侵检测平台。让安全能力覆盖每个环节,才能保证集群的安全稳定。

6. 参考

[1] https://github.com/cdk-team/CDK

[2] https://www.cdxy.me/?p=839

[3] https://kubernetes.io/docs/tasks/debug/debug-cluster/audit/

[4] https://discuss.kubernetes.io/t/security-advisory-cve-2022-3172-aggregated-api-server-can-cause-clients-to-be-redirected-ssrf/21322

[5]https://github.com/tencentyun/qcloud-documents/blob/master/product/%E5%AD%98%E5%82%A8%E4%B8%8ECDN/%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97%E6%9C%8D%E5%8A%A1/%E6%9C%80%E4%BD%B3%E5%AE%9E%E8%B7%B5/TKE%20%E5%AE%A1%E8%AE%A1%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90.md

[6] https://github.com/cdk-team/CDK/blob/main/pkg/exploit/k8s_backdoor_daemonset.go#LL35-L87C2

[7] https://github.com/cdk-team/CDK/blob/main/pkg/exploit/k8s_cronjob.go#LL34-L59C2

转自:https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?src=11&timestamp=1718538988&ver=5326&signature=rTJKHNXpoh30y0TbFwBI4K6dKr9a9H9cy02cLwI0naNx-pLVCqv*tmO0qtVbUh9iyMBO02muSJxzdOVeuzZXPT-0QIIEZy3h77GJ7k*-LXcVq1JFW69vEzgfg667VTOz&new=1

转载请注明:jinglingshu的博客 » 云原生安全-从k8s日志审计视角检测自动化工具攻击

发表我的评论
取消评论

表情

Hi,您需要填写昵称和邮箱!

  • 昵称 (必填)
  • 邮箱 (必填)
  • 网址